Hi Matthew, On Fri, 2020-10-02 at 16:09 -0400, Matthew Miller wrote: > ... > > For start I have prepared iotop-c: > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1878529 > > Looks pretty straightforward. One thing worth noting is that we > discourage > using "Conflicts:" > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/Conflicts/ True, with my user hat on, I'd prefer both programs installed simulaneously. But implementing alternatives requires coordination from all involved project's maintainers and I just skipped that part; also both programs are not identical in terms of command line options and will most probably diverge more with time; on the other hand for non- interactive use the compatibility is there... My feeling is that implementing alternatives is better for interactive use, and as a second option, installing it under its current name is also an option (and removing the conflicts). I need advise for this; its OK for me to prepare a PR implementing alternatives for iotop. > I know it's a pretty descriptive name, but: I notice your program has > other > improvements rather than just being written in C. I wonder if finding > a new > name that isn't based on the language implementation might be the > best > long-term approach? I didn't start that project, just improved it, and somehow changing the name does not seem right to me :) With best regards, b. _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
