My apologies, of course we are aiming to package the unversioned symbolic links to the "real" libraries to *-devel package. I thought it was clear from the beginning.
Why should we hack the soversion ? There are no changes to the soname or ABI compatibility coming, we want to just package the unversioned symbolic links to the "real" libraries to *-devel package.
On Thu, Oct 1, 2020 at 1:14 PM Richard Shaw <hobbes1069@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Adding my $0.02 here..._______________________________________________Since they are real libraries, they don't belong in a -devel package, the intent is to package the unversioned symbolic links to the "real" libraries. A end user package should never require a -devel package to run.One option would be to hack in a soversion to the build process. I did this for many years with openCOLLADA, and used either abi-compliance-checker or abipkgdiff to determine when a soversion bump was required.Thanks,Richard
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
