On Wed, 30 Sep 2020 10:14:55 +0200, Jakub Jelinek wrote: > it would be great if the > .debug_names some tool generates (whether it is GDB, some standalone > post-linking (and post dwz) tool, dwz itself, ...) is usable by both GDB and > LLDB, because the point in DWARF5 standardizing .debug_names was to make > those usable by everything rather than each tool rolling its own index. > We can't have two .debug_names sections, one for GDB and one for LLDB... This is discussed in the Change. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/DebugInfoLldbIndex#Detailed_Description You miss in your description that clang-built binaries must use clang-built .debug_names. Also AFAIK nobody plans to implement .debug_names support into DWZ (which also shows how DWZ is unmaintained) so DWZ must be excluded from builds using clang. Jan _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
