Re: Non-responsive maintainer: fedpop

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Sep 24, 2020 at 4:34 PM Carl George <carl@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
I read the policy [0] as "major (bug | security) fixes", and the CVE
is only rated as moderate [1].  Should the policy be read as "(major
bug | any security) fixes"?  I am not opposed to building the update
on F31 as well.

[0] https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Updates_Policy/#all-other-updates
[1] https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2020-13962

I'm not worried about getting that nit-pickey... If it addresses a CVE that's good enough for me.

It looks like mumble was rebuilt for a new protobuf, can you update (rebase) your pull request so it's mergeable? 

If you can do that fairly soon I'll try to make some time to merge it and perform the builds and push new updates.

Thanks,
Richard 
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux