Hi guys,
I sent the attached email out to player-dev@xxxxxx re: the platform for balto (helix player 2.0).
Feedback appreciated, particularly if this is going to cause probems for your distribution. Please include the player-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx list if possible. 2.0's coming out later in the year.
-- Ryan Gammon rgammon@xxxxxxxx Developer for Helix Player https://player.helixcommunity.org
--- Begin Message ---
- To: player-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: OS platform for Helix Player 2.0
- From: Ryan Gammon <rgammon@xxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 02 May 2005 13:18:34 -0700
- User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.7.5) Gecko/20050105 Debian/1.7.5-1
Hi all,
We're working on coming up with platform requirements for Helix Player 2.0 / Balto. Our initial list includes:
- gtk 2.4 or later (required, was: gtk 2.0 or later) - alsa 1.0 (optional, new) - dbus 0.31 or later (optional, new)
ALSA will be offered as an option along side OSS support. If a suitable version of ALSA is not present, the player will still function as an OSS player.
A DBus-enabled desktop will be required for universal media engine support. If dbus is not present, the player will still function with this feature disabled.
Does this sound reasonable to everyone?
-- Ryan Gammon rgammon@xxxxxxxx Developer for Helix Player https://player.helixcommunity.org
--- End Message ---
-- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
