Re: btrfs and default page sizes (4k vs 64k)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 9/16/20 3:18 PM, Eugene Syromiatnikov wrote:
On Wed, Sep 16, 2020 at 03:04:45PM -0400, Josef Bacik wrote:
At the time we tied the fs blocksize to the
page size, because it was unlikely that a user would mkfs a fs on one arch
and move it over to another arch.

But one doesn't need "another arch" for page size to change; many
architectures (arm, mips, powerpc, sparc, to name a few) support multiple
page sizes.

Sure, but again you are not likely to change page size for an existing system. The decision early on was to forgo this particular ability for simplicity, and then we would revisit the decision later on. It's been a while and there's still not been enough demand to justify the work until recently. Thanks,

Josef
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux