Re: [EPEL-devel] Proposing an EPEL packaging SIG

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Sep 14, 2020 at 08:54:57AM -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 11, 2020 at 11:52:03AM -0700, Michel Alexandre Salim wrote:

> > There are several changes we can make to both streamline the process,
> > and not increase the maintenance burden on the (other) maintainers of
> > these packages:
> > 
> > * Have an EPEL SIG modeled after the SIGs centered around programming
> > language stacks (e.g. Python, Haskell, Java)
> > * Have an expedited flow where this SIG can request EPEL branches and
> > admin access to packages if there are no response from package
> > maintainers for a set period (3 days? 1 week?)
> 
> Both of those are really short... I guess a week or two might be ok. 

The old pkgdb had one week for this (if after a week of the branch request being
opened the current admins had not rejected the branching (with a reason), the
branch request was processed).


Pierre

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux