On Tue, Sep 8, 2020, 9:16 AM Kaleb Keithley <kkeithle@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
I confess I'm a bit ignorant about how the ELN builds are going to be used. Especially the ELN builds of glusterfs and ceph.That aside—Red Hat ships GlusterFS and Ceph (RHGS and RHCS respectively) as products, and generally speaking glusterfs and ceph packages are not included in RHEL; at least they haven't been so far. There are special builds of RHGS in the RHEL base that are a subset of the RHGS product packages. And I'm not sure what, if any, subset of RHCS product packages are provided in the RHEL base.And at RHEL 8.0 (actually before 8.0) there were issues with RHEL 8 having inherited the Fedora glusterfs packages into the RHEL base which conflicted with what the product team was going to be providing — incorrect version, no subset, etc.I'd like to avoid a repeat of those issues. I hope the people working on ELN are coordinating with RHGS and RHCS product teams to avoid a recurrence of them.
Generally speaking, whatever is in Fedora at the branch time is what would be used. There are config files in eln that pull in various bits and ceph and gluster can edit those to pick up the right subpackages.
So it's all mostly up to ceph and gluster to land things in Fedora but we can of course discuss internally.
josh
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
