Re: [ELN] Update obsoleted for weird reasons

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Sep 09, 2020 at 08:07:24PM +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> Hello.
> 
> I've noticed at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python3.9 that the latest
> ELN release of python3.9 is behind Fedora.
> 
> I've assumed the build has failed, but it succeeded:
> 
> https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=1592756
> 
> Except it it not tagged to eln.
> 
> I've located the bodhi update:
> https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-8e33e741d8
> 
> It is "obsoleted" with "This update cannot be pushed to stable. These builds
> python3.9-3.9.0~rc1-2.eln103 have a more recent build in koji's eln tag."
> 
> I've checked the koji's eln tag and it has python3.9-3.9.0~rc1-1.eln103 now.
> 
> Maybe some different build was tagged when the update was created (no idea
> how to tell). If it was the Fedora build, it indeed has higher
> version-release if that's what meant by "more recent" -- however there is no
> "more recent" (more recently started or more recently completed) build of
> python3.9 in Koji.
> 
> This does not show anything suspicious:
> 
>   $ koji list-history --package=python3.9 | grep eln
> 
> Is this expected? Should the update be edited and pushed again? Or should
> the build be tagged manually? Am I expected to deal with that, as the
> package maintainer?
> 
> This particular build only fixes a minor user-facing issue and does not
> affect builds of dependent packages so we can "leave it be" and wait for the
> next build, however that might not always be the case.

I guess this is a bug, but What I think happened is: 

f33 python3.9 finished: 
Thu Aug 13 20:40:05 2020 python3.9-3.9.0~rc1-2.fc33 tagged into f33 by bodhi [still active]
( eln was inheriting from f33-build at the time )

Then, the eln build finished: 
Thu Aug 13 23:12:34 2020 python3.9-3.9.0~rc1-2.eln103 tagged into eln-updates-candidate
by bpeck/jenkins-continuous-infra.apps.ci.centos.org

but at this point bodhi looks and sees... hey f33 which we inherit
from already has a build of this version, so lets not push this to
stable. 

I think bodhi needs to be a bit smarter about checking for "more recent
builds". Possibly not looking at inheritence?

I could be wrong, but thats what it seems like from a quick glance... 

kevin

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux