On Sat, Sep 05, 2020 at 08:46:37AM -0400, Neal Gompa wrote: > > "BTRFS relatime vs. noatime - Huge Performance Difference - linux" https://www.reddit.com/r/linux/comments/imgler/btrfs_relatime_vs_noatime_huge_performance/?utm_source=amp&utm_medium=&utm_content=post_body > It's something that's being looked at, see > https://pagure.io/fedora-btrfs/project/issue/9 Huh. That's... unfortunate. I use atimes to keep ~/Downloads and ~/tmp from building up with cruft. I'm sure there's plenty of other practical use cases. I guess with btrfs I should make separate subvolumes for these or something? -- Matthew Miller <mattdm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Fedora Project Leader _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
