Re: Now and Xen:Complexities of Fedora,Grub,LVM and Xen

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, 15 Apr 2005, David Mohring wrote:

> a) Whats the chances of a stable ( enough ) Xen making it into the final
> release of FC4?

Pretty big, the current xen seems to be reasonably stable.
That doesn't mean all aspects will be easy to use, though...

> b) Is it going to be safe/stable/secure for the domain U kernels use LVM
> mounts? Or are loopback file systems, mounted by the domain 0 kernel,
> the only effective choice?

I've been using LVM volumes for Xen guests for a while now
and it's working fine.

> c) Is it worth allocating swap partitions for domain U systems? Is it
> safe/possible to use LVM for this? 

Yes, LVM works great.

> d) Is the combination of X-server/AGP/sound going to available and
> stable on domain 0 kernels? 

It already is, on some hardware ;)

If it isn't working right on your hardware, please consider
filing a bug on http://bugzilla.xensource.com/ (which is where
most Xen development takes place).

> e) Will the actual performance of the non-test final release kernels
> approach the performance of the recent Xen demos?  

It should.

> Have the Fedora Core core developer given any consideration to a single 
> "xen" init.d script which would : 
> 1) Setup the virtual networking for the domain 0 and domain U hosted
> systems. Virtual bridging + remote DHCP/static addressing 
>    OR internal DHCPd + NAT + plus forwarding
> 2) Allocate file system mount rights on a first come first served basis,
> with fall over of NFS mounting if the first serves the requested
> partition.

When it comes to things like this, I try to not do anything
Fedora specific, but instead develop things together with the
Xen community.

If you would like to get involved with the development of
such scripts, you may want to subscribe to the xen-devel
mailing list on lists.xensource.com.

> There should be an easier way to configuring the combinations of 
> Fedora,Grub,LVM and Xen than manually editing configure files and CLI
> launching instances.

> Lastly. Any word on getting a version of Anaconda to work under Domain U
> Server level? Ie VNCserver mode with the domain 0 host granting lvm
> partition/group access.

We've got plans for fixing these issues, but I don't know
when we'll get around to them.  Helping with the Xen 3.0
release is a higher priority at the moment.

-- 
"Debugging is twice as hard as writing the code in the first place.
Therefore, if you write the code as cleverly as possible, you are,
by definition, not smart enough to debug it." - Brian W. Kernighan

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux