Re: New segfault with flexiblas/openblaso

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, 4 Sep 2020 10:57:13 +0200
Iñaki Ucar <iucar@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> Strange... Let me bring this upstream to see whether this is
> flexiblas' or openblas' fault. In the meanwhile, exporting
> FLEXIBLAS=netlib before the tests makes use of the reference
> implementation, so everything should be slower but safer. And if this
> starts happening in the wild, we can change to openblas-serial with a
> quick update of FlexiBLAS.

... which would lead to a horrendous regression in performance, utterly
ruining parallellization.

If this happens, there is no alternative but to resort to the
contingency plan of the FlexiBLAS as BLAS/LAPACK manager: undo all
changes and rebuild all packages so that they work again as intended.
-- 
Susi Lehtola
Fedora Project Contributor
jussilehtola@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux