Re: Is s390 (32-bit) relevant for Fedora alt arch ?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, 4 Sep 2020 10:00:11 +0100
Daniel P. Berrangé <berrange@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> I'm looking at cleaning up some parts of the QEMU spec and we have
> conditionals in there testing for s390 arch (aka 32-bit). IIRC it
> was previously a secondary arch, at least back in the Fedora 22-ish
> timeframe. I'm not seeing it listed in the alternative arch list
> currently though:
> 
>   https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Architectures
> 
> Am I right in concluding that 's390' does not need to be considered in
> RPM spec files now, and thus we can purge any 's390' arch checks ?

that's correct, Fedora doesn't support s390 (32-bit) in any way for
some time, seems F-25 was the last with s390 support.


		Dan
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux