I'm doing a rebuild of the OCaml-related packages in F33 to move from OCaml 4.11.0 prerelease to OCaml 4.11.1 because: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1870368#c26 "A serious bug has been discovered last week in OCaml 4.11.0: explicit polymorphic annotations are checked too permissively. Some incorrect programs (possibly segfaulting) are accepted by the compiler in 4.11.0. Programs accepted by OCaml 4.10 are unchanged. We are thus releasing OCaml 4.11.1 as an early bugfix version. You are advised to upgrade to this new version if you were using OCaml 4.11.0." Unfortunately some of the packages now have release tags with .1 at the end because I forgot that my script would run rpmdev-bumpspec -r (rightmost), eg brltty got: -Release: 11%{?dist} +Release: 11%{?dist}.1 (https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/packageinfo?packageID=760) That wasn't intended, but it's happened now, so sorry about that one. I'm hoping that the upgrade path from F33 -> F34 should not be affected because IIUC: brltty ...-11.fc33.1 < -11.fc34 (Since these are being built into a side tag, if it turns out that I have broken the upgrade path then we could drop the builds before they get into F33.) Rich. -- Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat http://people.redhat.com/~rjones Read my programming and virtualization blog: http://rwmj.wordpress.com virt-top is 'top' for virtual machines. Tiny program with many powerful monitoring features, net stats, disk stats, logging, etc. http://people.redhat.com/~rjones/virt-top _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
