On Thursday 28 April 2005 07:30, Mike Hearn wrote:On Thu, 28 Apr 2005 08:00:58 -0400, Build System wrote: -lib-1.0.9rc2-1
> ------------------- > * Fri Apr 22 2005 Martin Stransky <stransky@xxxxxxxxxx> 1.0.9rc2-1 > - updated to 1.0.9rc2 > - add ainit tool > - dmix is now default pcm device
Is this really correct? The impression I got was that whether dmix was the
default or not was supposed to be defined by the card-specific config
file. Otherwise it looks like people who have chips that support
hardware mixing will have to use dmix anyway.
Also does anybody know if alsa-oss is available in Fedora yet? Last time I
looked I couldn't find it, but there are some nice fixes in CVS (I would
say that ;)
Yeah, I agree with your concerns. I always use non-onboard cards with hardware
mixing where I can. I don't want to be downgraded to software mixing in those
cases. I do think they should find a way to disable it for cards that do
hardware mixing.
what cards support hardware mixing? .. from what I know of alsa it doesn't support hardware mixing of multiple streams of audio. Thats why dmix should be enabled by default.
On the flip side, I am very happy to see dmix come long to replace the crap
that is artsd and esd.
artsd and esd are for network transparent audio still. that issue is still around.
-- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
-- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
