On Sun, Aug 30, 2020 at 11:34 PM Tomáš Popela <tpopela@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Mon, Aug 31, 2020 at 3:24 AM Neal Gompa <ngompa13@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >> On Sun, Aug 30, 2020 at 8:15 PM Chris Murphy <lists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> > >> > Fedora-Silverblue-ostree-x86_64-33-20200830.n.0.iso does not have nano >> > on the install media itself. Is it intentional? >> > >> >> It's supposed to be there, but I don't know how Silverblue is >> "defined" so it would be pulled in. I thought it'd get it from the >> comps groups... > > > It should be there :/ : > > https://pagure.io/workstation-ostree-config/blob/f33/f/fedora-common-ostree-pkgs.yaml#_139 Just to restate, I'm referring to the booted ISO environment itself. I just tried Everything netinstall, and it's not there either. Which means boot.iso doesn't have it. And boot.iso is the basis for all netinstalls and DVDs that are not live, and I'm pretty sure Silverblue is a DVD variant. Looks at comps, I see vim-minimal is in core group. I'm betting that's probably why it's pulled into boot.iso. And I think nano-default-editor should be added to core group in comps to cause it and nano to be pulled into the ISOs. Almost no one needs an editor in this environment, but I ran into it while testing. If someone boots a netinstall or dvd to rescue an installation, maybe they'd like to use nano (even out of newly formed habit :) ) to edit grub config or fstab. Michael I'm pretty sure this is the same thing that I ran into with zram-generator-defaults and had to add it to core to pull it into all media. Can you double check my math? :) -- Chris Murphy _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
