On 30. 08. 20 4:07, Michel Alexandre Salim wrote:
Quick question: for Python there's both python-devel and python-sig --
this seems overkill for Lua, right? Would starting lua@lists be enough?
Not only it is overkill, but it brings problems.
For the story, see this ticket:
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/5478
tl;dr the python-devel list is open to anybody
the python-sig is a private (bugzilla mostly) list for the packaging group
people are confused why cannot they see the python-sig list
even when they are members of the Python SIG
For a new SIG I'd do the following:
Establish a FAS group for "Lua provenpackagers". Make sure the name it not to be
confused with the Lua SIG, but note that the FAS group usually needs to be
called ...-sig. I'd go with lua-packagres-sig or lua-maintainers-sig. Get it a
mailing list needed for Bugzilla, e.g. lua-packagres-sig@lists. Don't mention it
anywhere :)
Establish a general mailing list about Lua. Most likely lua@lists. Mention it
everywhere.
(Also, I couldn't find documentation on starting a new mailing list.
Presumably an Infra pagure ticket?)
Yes.
--
Miro Hrončok
--
Phone: +420777974800
IRC: mhroncok
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
