Re: [HOWTO] Keep using Rawhide after branching

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Dne 28. 08. 20 v 19:09 Adam Williamson napsal(a):
> On Fri, 2020-08-28 at 18:51 +0200, Vít Ondruch wrote:
>> Dne 25. 08. 20 v 16:25 Petr Menšík napsal(a):
>>> No, unfortunately the key is there, but the package is incomplete.
>>>
>>> If you have enabled gpg signatures verification, it would fail. At least
>>> it does to me.
>>>
>>> Check it with:
>>>
>>> rpm -ql fedora-gpg-keys | grep fedora-34-$(arch)
>>>
>>> It just does not provide correct key.
>>
>> Actually, yesterday I did update of another system with my approach and
>> you are right that the fedora-gpg-keys-33-0.9 did not contained the
>> proper links to the key. However, the fedora-gpg-keys-33-0.10 works just
>> fine (not really sure what caused the difference).
> The change to archmap in this commit:
> https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/fedora-repos/c/5f02f474842d23a0217c1118893f508009236c18?branch=f33
> which landed between 0.9 and 0.10 (the versioning was fixed up in the
> next commit).


Thx, right, I have missed that. Pretty confusing series of commits :(


Vít
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux