On Thu, Aug 13, 2020 at 2:16 PM <jkonecny@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Hello everyone, > > Anaconda team has decided to deprecate use of Anaconda kernel boot > parameters without 'inst.' prefix. As you may already know you can > specify Anaconda kernel boot parameters both with and without 'inst.' > prefix (e.g. 'inst.repo=' or 'repo='). This deprecation means that when > you use Anaconda option without the 'inst.' prefix you will now get a > warning. We are *not* disabling parameters without a prefix yet. > > The reason for this is keep running into parameter conflicts with other > projects. As an example there is 'debug' parameter for both kernel and > us, so when you want to enable kernel debugging in installation > environment you will also enable Anaconda debug mode. > > Because of this I have created the following pull request for Anaconda: > > https://github.com/rhinstaller/anaconda/pull/2786 > > > In case you have any objections please start discussion either on the > pull request or here. > > > Best regards, > Jirka This may be a stupid question, but why are parameter namespaced with "inst." and not with "anaconda."? Is this a historical artifact? "inst" is a pretty generic term as well, and "anaconda" would definitely not lead to parameter overloading on the kernel cmdline. Fabio _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
