On Mon, 2005-04-25 at 16:00 -0400, David Hollis wrote:
> On Mon, 2005-04-25 at 15:57 -0400, David Cary Hart wrote:
> > Is gcc4 being ported to FC3? If I rebuild libtool with gcc4, will that
> > resolve the dependency (albeit after the fact).
>
> I'm certainly not authoritative on the subject, but I'm pretty confident
> that the answer is no. One of the main reasons for putting out new
> releases of Fedora rapidly is to prevent the desire/requirement to
> backport everything to older revisions. If gcc4 is something that you
> require, you can quite likely recompile the SRPM on FC3 and it may work
> ok (I don't know if there are any glibc rev dependencies or the like).
> Of course, all of that is at your own risk, buyer beware, all of that
> good stuff.
>
I don't require gcc4. I have been experimenting with things like this to
improve my FQ.
I did build GCC4 (VERY long compile time BTW). On install:
error: Failed dependencies:
binutils >= 2.15.94.0.2-2 is needed by gcc-4.0.0-1.1.P4.i686
gcc = 3.4.3 is needed by (installed)
libtool-1.5.6-4.FC3.2.1.P4.i686
libgcj.so.5 is needed by (installed) ecj-3.0.1-5.i386
libgcj.so.5 is needed by (installed)
gettext-devel-0.14.1-12.i386
libf2c is needed by (installed) compat-gcc-g77-8-3.3.4.2.i386
Most are no problem and I assume that I can rebuild libtool. My concern
is compat-gcc.
> --
> fedora-devel-list mailing list
> fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
> http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
--
Multi-RBL Check: http://www.TQMcube.com/rblcheck.htm
Kill Spam at the Source: http://www.TQMcube.com/spam_trap.htm
Today's Spam Trap Adds: http://www.TQMcube.com/BlockedToday
RBLDNSD HowTo: http://www.TQMcube.com/rbldnsd.htm
