Hi, Stephen. On Wednesday, 05 August 2020 at 21:36, Stephen Gallagher wrote: > FESCo has requested that I submit the module policy once more to the > Fedora development list for discussion. Feedback is welcome. [...] > * The default stream of a module *MUST NOT* change to a different > stream within a released Fedora version.footnote:[This is an extension > of the https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Updates_Policy/#stable-releases[stable > updates policy].] The default stream *MAY* be changed in Rawhide or > during Fedora upgrades. Changes to default streams *MUST* be approved > via a https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/program_management/changes_policy/#_change_process[Fedora > Change proposal]. > * Packages *MAY* convert from a non-modular package to a modular > default stream (or the reverse) only in Rawhide or during Fedora > upgrades. > * Default streams *MUST NOT* provide a binary RPM with the same > package name as a non-modular RPM in the same release except in the > case of a transition from one to the other.footnote:[Modular packages > shadow non-modular ones. This rule ensures that we don't have any > shadowed packages in the default package set.] [1] Transitions to/from modular are already forbidden in Fedora releases, so saying "in the same release" makes no sense. I'd say "in rawhide or during Fedora upgrades". > * Default streams *MUST NOT* provide a binary RPM with the same > package name as an RPM in a default stream in the same release except > in the case of a transition from one to the other.footnote:[In this > situation, whichever has the highest NEVRA would win the depsolving > and could break the other module.] I guess "transition to another default module" is what is meant above. > * Multiple default streams *MUST NOT* provide the same binary package > names at runtime.footnote:[They *MAY* provide other well-known names > in the same manner as permitted for non-modular content. For example, > two different default streams *MAY* provide content to be used with > the `alternatives` system or virtual `Provides` for capabilities.] > * Default streams *MUST NOT* provide a package that overrides a > package of the same name in the non-modular content except in approved > cases of migration between modular and non-modular delivery. This is redundant, already mentioned above[1]. Regards, Dominik -- Fedora https://getfedora.org | RPM Fusion http://rpmfusion.org There should be a science of discontent. People need hard times and oppression to develop psychic muscles. -- from "Collected Sayings of Muad'Dib" by the Princess Irulan _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
