On Tuesday, August 4, 2020 1:45:52 AM MST Vít Ondruch wrote: > Yesterday, I have updated my Rawhide and wondered why `dnf autoremove` > would want to remove earlyoom just to discover that soft dependency in > earlyoom was dropped [1] and hence nothing requires earlyoom and DNF is > free to remove this package (and it is possibly not installed anymore on > upgraded systems). > > Therefore I wonder what is the status of EarlyOOM. Should I let the > package go? If not, then the situation should be fixed somehow, probably > either by reverting the revert or adding the dependency into > fedora-release as was proposed elsewhere. Generally, if you let the package go, your system won't suffer from your processes getting killed needlessly. This is likely a benefit, so I don't know if this is really a bug. -- John M. Harris, Jr. _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
