Dominique Martinet wrote on Tue, Aug 04, 2020:
> I would appreciate slightly less conflicting exchanges in the future;
> I'm happy to do things differently if I'm pointed at problems but there
> *is* a change of behaviour with LTO and that isn't wrong.
>
> I apprently proceeded to fix it in a way that's not appropriate for
> fedora, but this is this and that is that, no need to shout.
Actually I take that back, this really is a LTO/gcc bug.
They compile everything that the compiler supports and at runtime detect
what is available and run the appropriate best function ('best' being
decided uppon the order of an enum, so YMMV, but at least it won't try
to run the neon function on a board that doesn't have neon even if the
binary enables it).
So I'd really need a way to have only that file compiled with the
optimisations, and other files without it -- Jeff or someone else, could
you please advise?
Thanks,
--
Dominique
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
