Re: Fedora flatpaks on non-x86 architectures

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Mhm okay, is there any reason you need such complicated machinery for getting flatpaks available in Fedora? The point is, for me, the desktop sandboxing capabilities, and specially when they'll actually be effective after the death of X11-only applications eco-system wide.

The issue with Flatpaks on Fedora right now is that you pretty much must go through Flathub, and for many reasons, Flathub is not up to Fedora's packaging quality standards at all. Also, it ships proprietary software. For me, it is desirable to have flatpak packaging for the sandboxing capabilities but keep the software synchronized and maintained along with Fedora.

It seems wholly unnecessary to me to *require* a full-blown Kubernetes cluster for building Flatpaks.

I hear that they are OCI images right now, possibly revisit?

I am willing to help this, I want flatpaks with sandboxing for more secure desktop with Fedora.
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux