separate RPMOPTS for c and c++?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
Subject: separate RPMOPTS for c and c++?
From: sean <seandarcy2@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 24 Apr 2005 15:02:20 -0400
List-archive: <https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list>
List-help: <mailto:fedora-devel-list-request@redhat.com?subject=help>
List-id: Development discussions related to Fedora Core <fedora-devel-list.redhat.com>
List-post: <mailto:fedora-devel-list@redhat.com>
List-subscribe: <http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list>, <mailto:fedora-devel-list-request@redhat.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list>, <mailto:fedora-devel-list-request@redhat.com?subject=unsubscribe>
Reply-to: Development discussions related to Fedora Core <fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: news <news@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.8a6) Gecko/20041209

On fc4t am64, I've set rpmopts as:

optflags: x86_64 -O3 -fPIC -ffast-math -fomit-frame-pointer -funit-at-a-time -mtune=athlon64 -ftree-vectorize -fvisibility-inlines-hidden

Now -fvisibility-inlines-hidden is only for g++. It generates a warning mesage for gcc. Is there a way of setting the CFLAGS differently from CXXFLAGS?

sean

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Follow-Ups:
- Re: separate RPMOPTS for c and c++?
  - From: Jakub Jelinek

Prev by Date: Re: starting wireless with WPA, ralink rt2500
Next by Date: Re: separate RPMOPTS for c and c++?
Previous by thread: starting wireless with WPA, ralink rt2500
Next by thread: Re: separate RPMOPTS for c and c++?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Fedora Announce] [Fedora Kernel] [Fedora Testing] [Fedora Formulas] [Fedora PHP Devel] [Kernel Development] [Fedora Legacy] [Fedora Maintainers] [Fedora Desktop] [PAM] [Red Hat Development] [Gimp] [Yosemite News]