On Sun, 2020-08-02 at 11:27 -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > On Sun, Aug 02, 2020 at 12:55:28PM +0000, Fedora Rawhide Report wrote: > > OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20200731.n.0 > > NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20200802.n.0 > > > > ===== SUMMARY ===== > > Added images: 4 > > Dropped images: 5 > > Added packages: 11 > > Dropped packages: 6 > > Upgraded packages: 18240 > > Downgraded packages: 41 > > I ran the releng check-latest-build script to fix these 41 downgrades: Just went through these. Most were correct - the apparently-newer build really was newer - but some were not, due to errors in package versioning (the 'newer' build is actually an older build with a problematic version). CCing the recent builders of all affected packages to take appropriate action. Packagers, please refresh your memory on https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/Versioning and https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Package_Versioning_Examples , particularly regarding correct versioning of pre-release builds. When correcting a package's versioning to meet the guidelines, please remember to check if the corrected version parses as older, and if so either bump the Epoch or do something else (e.g. cut an upstream release, if you can) to fix that. I've put "FAO <FAS name>" at the start of each item so you can just search for your FAS name to find the package that I'm CCing you for. > ansible-lint-4.2.0-5.fc33 < ansible-lint-4.2.0a1-2.fc32 > retagged ansible-lint-4.2.0a1-2.fc32 to f33 FAO pnemade: This is clearly a package versioning error, the Alpha build should've been versioned 4.2.0-0.2.alpha1 or so. Will need a 4.2.1 or an epoch bump to fix unfortunately. > fpdns-0.10.0-4.20190131.fc33 < fpdns-0.10.0-20190131.fc31.2 > retagged fpdns-0.10.0-20190131.fc31.2 to f33 FAO mmckinst, jplesnik: Also looks like a versioning error. The fc31.2 build is basically entirely missing the 'normal' release component. Mark fixed the versioning in fpdns-0.10.0-1.20190131.fc32 , but did not bump the epoch, so the new builds are lower versioned than the older ones. Again needs an epoch bump or a new version (or a *really* big release tag...) to fix properly. > git-lab-porcelain-0-2020325git75a12220.fc33.2 < git-lab-porcelain-0-20200123git4eeaa725.fc32.1 > retagged git-lab-porcelain-0-20200123git4eeaa725.fc32.1 to f33 FAO nhorman: More date fun! This looks like a 0 typo: the newer build has '2020325' instead of '20200325' (I do this one myself all the damn time, sigh). Fixing that typo would make things work, though the versioning is still violating the guidelines by not having a 0.x release number between the (notional) version and the snapshot date. Fixing that would require bumping either the notional version or the epoch, though, and it likely won't ever cause a real problem unless there's ever an actual stable release versioned '0'. > > golang-github-acobaugh-osrelease-0-3.20200607gita93a0a5.fc33 < golang-github-acobaugh-osrelease-0.0.0-1.2020 > 0607gita93a0a5.fc33 FAO eclipseo, harrymichal: This looks like rpm considers 0.0.0 to be higher than 0. Interesting. Needs a version higher than 0.0.0 or an epoch bump. > icedtea-web-2.0.0-pre.0.3.alpha13.patched1.fc33.5 < icedtea-web-2.0.0-pre.2.alpha13.patched1.fc33 > retagged icedtea-web-2.0.0-pre.2.alpha13.patched1.fc33 to f33 FAO jvanek: you made the versioning more correct between icedtea-web- 2.0.0-pre.2.alpha13.patched1.fc33 and icedtea-web-2.0.0- pre.0.2.alpha13.patched1.fc33 , but 'pre.0.2' (and 'pre.0.3' and 'pre.0.anything') parses as lower than 'pre.2', so this needed an epoch bump to work right. (I think the 'pre' could also be left out as it isn't doing anything useful, but IMBW there). > pveclib-1.0.4-4.fc33 < pveclib-1.0.4alpha2-3.fc33 > retagged pveclib-1.0.4alpha2-3.fc33 to f33 FAO munroesj52: this is a pre-release naming fail - '1.0.4alpha2' parses as higher than '1.0.4' to rpm. Needs an epoch bump or a 1.0.5 release. Older build should have been versioned 'pveclib-1.0.4- 0.1.alpha2' or so, please bear that in mind for future pre-releases. > salt-3001-2.fc33 < salt-3001rc1-2.fc33 > retagged salt-3001rc1-2.fc33 to f33 FAO dmurphy18 (SaltStack Packaging Team): same as pveclib - '3001rc1' parses as higher than '3001'. Needs epoch bump or release above 3001. Older build should have been salt-3001-0.2.rc1. Also your email address is wrong in the package changelog, it has .com.com not just .com. :) -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net http://www.happyassassin.net _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
