On Sat, Aug 01, 2020 at 03:15:59PM +0200, Fabio Valentini wrote: > On Sat, Aug 1, 2020 at 3:12 PM Michael J Gruber <mjg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > Well, that second mass rebuild made things worse for me. > > The time between the two was really short - we do need time to fix things (see below). > > The second rebuild not only forced us to rebase changes which were in QA > > (and rewrite the changelog because of date order stubbornness) > > but - what's worse - made the "buildroot" a moving target. > > I do understand that we want rebuilds against current libraries > > but this seemed to break more dependencies than before, > > maybe because the rebuild was still in progress. Sorry for not communicating better about the second pass. The goal was to just try and rebuild everything that _failed_ in the first pass. We have a lot of packages that failed due to transient failures like the s390x package cache having issues on tuesday night and broken binutils, etc. > I agree, adding the "Mass Rebuild Second Attempt" commit and release > bump was completely unnecessary ... (especially since NEVRs for builds > that didn't succeed aren't reserved, and are overwritten by any > successful build with the same NEVR ...) Normally we would have just resubmitted them, but the eln folks asked us to do another bump to pick up fixes that were not in the first one. The mass rebuild is done now, will get merged soon. kevin
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
