> On Wed, 2020-07-29 at 14:13 +0100, sergio(a)serjux.com wrote: > In general I want to have a very good > indicator the issue is LTO related before I > disable. THe build you referenced doesn't have any good indicators that LTO is > the problem. > > For ppc64le is that the build was done with p8, but there is one function > (__builtin_altivec_vadub) that requires p9. This seems like a package bug at > first glance, not an LTO issue. I would try a ppc64le test build with and > without LTO, my guess is both are going to fail with similar problems. I don't see p8 mentioned specifically in the opencv spec, but how would one build with p9 (once the buildroot is OK again, gettext...)? _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
