Re: Duplicate package was reviewed

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 30.07.2020 10:03, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Independently of what the current packaging guidelines say about this 
> (apparently, "compat-" is not even a thing anymore there, see Rathann's 
> reply), it simply does not make sense to use any sort of prefixing or 
> suffixing to the package name when the old and the new library have 
> different package names (as in this case: libqmatrixclient vs. libquotient).

Previously it wasn't allowed to push different versions of the same
project into repositories. That's why Fedora Modularity was invented.

I see the this is permitted now, sorry for the noise.

-- 
Sincerely,
  Vitaly Zaitsev (vitaly@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx)
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux