Re: We have to talk about annobin... again

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Jeff Law wrote:
> :(  I'll raise it again with Nick and Jakub, it's a sore point for
> everyone I think and it causes far more friction than just what we see
> here in Fedora.

IMHO, we should just drop annobin from Fedora (or at least disable it). It 
provides no tangible benefit to end users and the regular sync issues with 
the toolchain are a constant source of pain for packagers. Would it not be 
enough to do periodic rebuilds with annobin in a side tag to catch packages 
that are built with insecure or otherwise suboptimal flags, instead of 
burdening the production repository with this debugging tool?

        Kevin Kofler
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux