Re: s390 builds failing with "All mirrors were tried"

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, 2020-07-29 at 09:19 -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 29, 2020 at 10:31:32AM -0400, Scott Talbert wrote:
> > On Wed, 29 Jul 2020, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> > 
> > > libnbd failed in the mass rebuild.  I kicked off a second build by
> > > hand, and it failed in the exact same way:
> > > 
> > > https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=48118058
> > > 
> > > DEBUG util.py:623:  Downloading Packages:
> > > DEBUG util.py:621:  Error: Error downloading packages:
> > > DEBUG util.py:621:    Cannot download toplink/packages/ocaml/4.11.0/0.4.dev2.fc33/s390x/ocaml-compiler-libs-4.11.0-0.4.dev2.fc33.s390x.rpm: All mirrors were tried
> > > 
> > > Is this a generic s390 problem of is there really something wrong with
> > > the ocaml-compiler-libs package?  If it's generic then I guess this
> > > sort of error could be affecting a lot of other packages in the mass
> > > rebuild.
> > 
> > Seems to be a generic s390x problem (with networking / connectivity?). At
> > least one of my packages failed in a similar was on s390x.
> 
> Yes, the local to the s390x builders cache had issues last night.
> I disabled all builders and rebooted it, but likely it failed a lot of
> builds. 
> 
> Additionally, it seems like from time to time it just gets swamped.
> 
> We are planning on resubmitting the failed builds after the mass rebuild
> is complete. Or you can feel free to resubmit any of yours that failed
> in this way before then. 
> 
> I already have some ideas on how to make the s390x setup more robust,
> but I'm not going to make changes in the middle of the mass rebuild, but
> hopefully that will help for the next one. 
That reminds me.  My local testing has shown that -flto=auto works reasonably
well and can help significantly with build times (it parallelizes the compiler
invocations that occur at link time).

It'd planned to enable it after the mass rebuild, but I find myself wondering if
I should go ahead and update redhat-rpm-config now so that the second pass over
the packages will be faster.

Thoughts?

jeff
> 
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux