Re: PSA: dnf autoremove cleans fedora-repos-modular

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 11. 07. 20 1:59, John M. Harris Jr wrote:
On Friday, July 10, 2020 2:53:30 PM MST Miro Hrončok wrote:
On 10. 07. 20 23:35, John M. Harris Jr wrote:

DNF should perform "dnf mark install fedora-repos-rawhide-modular"
action
on a system upgrade, because we want that package to be prensented on
the system. However I worry that DNF does not possess a capability for
doing it. (Except of injecting that command into some externally
executed
script.)



Can we amend dnf system-upgrade to do this?

Wouldn't that install modular repos on systems that end users have removed
it from? Is there a way around that?


My idea was:

if fedora-repos-modular is installed:
      dnf mark install fedora-repos-modular
else:
      pass

Ah, gotcha. Sounds like a plan.

Since there was no followup, I've created

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1860408

--
Miro Hrončok
--
Phone: +420777974800
IRC: mhroncok
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux