On Tuesday, July 21, 2020 4:02:29 PM CEST Neal Gompa wrote: > On Tue, Jul 21, 2020 at 9:51 AM Kamil Dudka <kdudka@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > What exactly do you mean by "work"? If the option does not take any > > effect, that is perfectly fine because the Fedora change did not reach > > EPEL-8 (yet). > > > > Or are you saying that using cmake -B. breaks EPEL-8 builds? Do you have > > any example? > > I'm saying that doing that is supposed to break CMake on RHEL 8 > because the option isn't supported. That's *why* I haven't yet > backported the macros to EPEL 8. I am trying to work around missing > features in CMake. That does not really matter. My fix based on `-B.` works fine on Fedora and does not break anything on EPEL-7 and EPEL-8. It is currently not needed on EPEL-8 but it is harmless and I am able to use a single spec file (without any %ifdef) everywhere. In case the backward-incompatible change of the %cmake macro reaches EPEL-8 (after an update of cmake), the fix will work there, too. Kamil _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
