On 20/07/20 17:08 +0100, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
On 20/07/20 10:54 -0500, Steven Munroe wrote:
That looks like a more complete list. Still having problems with dependencies:
$ sudo dnf install devtoolset-9-gcc-9.3.1-2.el7.ppc64le.rpm
devtoolset-9-gcc-c++-9.3.1-2.el7.ppc64le.rpm
devtoolset-9-runtime-9.1-0.el7.ppc64le.rpm
devtoolset-9-libstdc++-devel-9.3.1-2.el7.ppc64le.rpm
Last metadata expiration check: 0:11:27 ago on Mon 20 Jul 2020 10:40:31 AM CDT.
Error:
Problem 1: conflicting requests
- nothing provides libmpfr.so.4()(64bit) needed by
devtoolset-9-gcc-9.3.1-2.el7.ppc64le
Problem 2: conflicting requests
- nothing provides libmpfr.so.4()(64bit) needed by
devtoolset-9-gcc-c++-9.3.1-2.el7.ppc64le
But:
$ sudo dnf install mpfr
Last metadata expiration check: 0:12:04 ago on Mon 20 Jul 2020 10:40:31 AM CDT.
Package mpfr-4.0.2-4.fc32.ppc64le is already installed.
Dependencies resolved.
So devtoolset must want a "special" mpfr but it is not obvious which
devtoolset package provides.
It's not special, it's just older.
The one in F32 provides libmpfr.so.6 IIRC, which is a different SONAME
to the one in EL7, so incompatible with the EL7 devtoolset.
Why can't you install it in an EL7 mock chroot, as suggested earlier?
There's nothing special about devtoolset here, EL7 packages just
aren't meant to work on F32.
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
