On Thu, Jul 09, 2020 at 02:15:03PM -0400, Matthew Miller wrote: > On Thu, Jul 09, 2020 at 11:09:57AM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: > > What we're dealing with now is awkward consequences of this change for > > existing installs, where we'd probably want to *keep* modular repos, > > especially if any modules are actually enabled. > > Is it a terrible idea to suggest that MBS insert a "Requires: > fedora-repos-modular" into all of the packages built in that system? > Does rpmbuild have such capability? -- Petr
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
