Re: Btrfs in Silverblue

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Jul 10, 2020 at 6:45 AM Marek Suchánek <msuchane@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> I haven't seen any mention of Silverblue in the Btrfs discussions. Will Silverblue also switch to Btrfs if the change is approved?
>
> I've tested installing Silverblue 32 and Rawhide with the default Btrfs partitioning suggested by Anaconda, and in both cases the system failed to boot after installation. It couldn't mount the Btrfs subvolumes.
>
> Is that a known issue or should I report it as a bug?
>

The expectation is that Silverblue will follow along with Workstation,
yes. We do know about the bug and have a fix proposed to Anaconda:
https://github.com/rhinstaller/anaconda/pull/2720


-- 
真実はいつも一つ!/ Always, there's only one truth!
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux