Re: Enable EarlyOOM on Fedora KDE - Fedora 33 Self-Contained Change proposal

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Matthew Miller wrote:
> I also don't see any reason to be required to keep unsolicited negative
> "private" emails secret. There's no agreement that they should be.
> However, I would request that you ignore them rather than bringing them
> back to the list. We can unsubscribe and moderate, but we can't do
> anything about reading and off-list replies, and I'd prefer for them to
> not get dragged back here. (My suggestion is to just ignore.)

Well, as I understand it, the main reason he is sending those private 
replies is that he was banned from the mailing list, or put on moderation or 
something.

If this mailing list were actually a place where people are allowed to voice 
their technical criticisms without censorship, we would not have this 
situation to begin with.

Judging from the forwarded mail, I disagree with Harald on this particular 
issue, but that does not mean I think we should not listen to his points.

        Kevin Kofler
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux