On Wed, Jul 8, 2020 at 9:50 AM Matthew Miller <mattdm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > More data is always better. I like qualifying the situations in that way. I > think we should make our decision based on the "center" rather than the > edges, though. > > For I hope obvious reasons, I'd love to see this tested on a Lenovo X1 > Carbon Gen 8 with the default SSD options. > > And, for benchmarks, I'm thinking more application benchmarks than a > benchmark of the compression itself. How much does compressed /usr affect > boot times for GNOME and KDE? What about startup time for LibreOffice, > Firefox, etc? Any impact on run-time usage? https://paste.centos.org/view/f4165396 Two workloads: install and update. It might seem like an update is both read and write dependent, but the rpms are already compressed and don't get compressed again. The differences, I expect, are mostly write performance. And this suggests it's a wash. I'd say this setup is fairly middle of the pack. The space savings, however, isn't a wash. -- Chris Murphy _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
