Re: SwapOnZRAM and how it affects earlyoom thresholds

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Jul 9, 2020 at 10:49 am, Rex Dieter <rdieter@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Upon reading the SwapOnZRAM feature proposal, I see it is advocating
allocating 50% of ram for swap. I'd like folks to consider and evaluate how this impacts earlyoom. It effectively makes the earlyoom memory threshold double (right?). If so, at least think about lowering 4 to (2 or 3), since
that will make earlyoom's behavior closer to before swaponzram was
introduced.

Well it's min(50% of RAM, 4 GB). You never get more than 4 GB of zram.

_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux