Re: Using "rawhide" for the dist-git branch for Fedora Rawhide

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Jul 07, 2020 at 10:13:36PM +0000, Gary Buhrmaster wrote:

> I (strongly) support the renaming of the branch, but I really
> really would prefer there to be a rough consensus on the
> replacement name across the entire git community, so
> that I don't need to remember to git-checkout devel in one
> project, git-checkout trunk in another, git-checkout main in
> a third, git-checkout release in a fourth, git-checkout default
> in a fifth, etc.(*).  In this case, I would prefer Fedora follow
> the rough consensus presuming that one can be achieved
> rather than pick yet another (different) name.

There are several other branches than the branch for Rawhide that have a
name that is unlikely to be found in many other projects like f32, el6,
epel7, epel8-playground. Why is it more intuitive to use a name from
other projects as the name for the branch for Rawhide?

Thanks
Till
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux