On Tue, Jul 07, 2020 at 10:13:36PM +0000, Gary Buhrmaster wrote: > I (strongly) support the renaming of the branch, but I really > really would prefer there to be a rough consensus on the > replacement name across the entire git community, so > that I don't need to remember to git-checkout devel in one > project, git-checkout trunk in another, git-checkout main in > a third, git-checkout release in a fourth, git-checkout default > in a fifth, etc.(*). In this case, I would prefer Fedora follow > the rough consensus presuming that one can be achieved > rather than pick yet another (different) name. There are several other branches than the branch for Rawhide that have a name that is unlikely to be found in many other projects like f32, el6, epel7, epel8-playground. Why is it more intuitive to use a name from other projects as the name for the branch for Rawhide? Thanks Till _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
