On Mon, 2005-04-18 at 18:31 -0700, Michael A. Peters wrote: > On Mon, 2005-04-18 at 19:21 -0300, Steven Garrity wrote: > > Marius Andreiana wrote: > > > Anyway, eog is only 600k. It doesn't worth discussing/arguing about it. > > > If some people want it, let it be and let's move to next :-) > > > > Good point. However, it's not just a matter of disk space. It also means > > one more item in the "Graphics" menu - which is a bigger deal. > > Yeah - I mean there's four items in my menu, it's so confusing! Is one of them actually Eye of Gnome? Here's a snippet from the spec file (yanked from the cvs repo): %prep %setup -q echo "NoDisplay=true" >> eog.desktop.in Eye of Gnome certainly doesn't seems to show up in my desktop menu, so it doesn't seem to add much to the clutter. For now, I think eog actually fills a need as a quick image previewer. (Oh yes, it deals with SVG files as well, which is sort of useful.) At some point maybe Evince will turn into a universal document viewer and in that case perhaps eog can be ditched but right now it seems to be worth keeping. Per -- Per Bjornsson <perbj@xxxxxxxxxxxx> Ph.D. Candidate, Department of Applied Physics, Stanford University
