Re: Emacs vs. XEmacs

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Gérard Milmeister wrote:
That FC4 will contain only Emacs, not XEmacs, is fine with me - in
principle.  However the XEmacs distribution contains the sumo package

[As Ville already mentioned, xemacs and xemacs-sumo are in Fedora Extras Devel already for fc4.]

which contains important packages like auctex. Currently auctex is not
part of FC4. Maybe there should be a package similar to sumo, but for
Emacs.

Agreed. I have long thought that something like sumo for Emacs would be very useful. Actually one of the main reasons I have been an XEmacs user for so long is due to the sumo distributions I would say.

It would certainly be something worthwhile doing for Extras IMHO,
and in the long term it could perhaps make its way into core if
that would be desirable.  Or better if someone with the time and interest
could maintain independently the package collection for emacs
(like xemacs-sumo) that would be a good service to the Emacs community
I think.  Perhaps starting from xemacs-{,mule-}sumo packages would
be easiest.

Debian also has something called emacs-goodies-el which is more a
collection of single file elisp libraries afaics, which may also be
worth looking at.

Jens


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux