Re: The future of legacy BIOS support in Fedora.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



I don't know about how important EFI and reducing the bootloader technical debt is for the project, but at least for me personally, it will be a straight way out. My hard disk has a traditional MBR based structure with about a TB of very important data. I don't know of a 100% reliable way of converting it to GPT. While I do have backup for most important files, not everything is backed up nor do I have means to do so.

The system works perfectly fine for me and I see no reason why I should opt for EFI. What is the value add for me, at least till I don't upgrade to a newer system? which I won't be at least for next 2 years. So forcing such a no-value-add change to existing user will drive them away. At least I would opt for a different distro in such case even though it's not something I want to do.

I feel the better approach would be to use it as default for new installations, if the disks are appropriately formatted or are empty at the time of installation. Else a fall back to grub should be transparently done.

Just my 2 cents from a user's perspective.
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux