On Friday, July 3, 2020 9:51:20 AM CEST Nicolas Mailhot via devel wrote: > it will certainly be possible to compute a second level of sources > during the dynamic buildrequires first pass over prep, and the change > makes the forge macro code modular enough the second level will be > auto-registered in sourcelist, but how is the buildsystem supposed to > provide sources that did not exist during its first pass over the spec > file? Possible. But I personally think that "dynamic buidlrequires" should stay working with BuildRequires, not Sources. > and Fabio’s most excellent rewrite of the spectool code (if you have > not used it yet, try it, it’s good). However someone needs to add > lookaside or buildsys integration to spectool to spectool so spectool > has something to source new sources from in a restricted build context. Let me just state my opinion that I don't like this situation coming. Packaging should be simple task, and should be made simpler, obvious. That said, I like that package build is just: SPEC + sources + patches + build dependencies I'd appreciate the link to spectool rewrite, though. Pavel _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
