Re: WebRTC packaging

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Jul 2, 2020 at 12:41 PM Vitaly Zaitsev via devel
<devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Hello all!
>
> Is it okay to package Google's static-only WebRTC library? This package
> will provide only webrtc-static and webrtc-devel subpackages.
>
> I need this library to build another packages. Bundling it directly is
> not a good idea, because this library is very big and significantly
> slows down the build process especially on different low-memory
> architectures, such as ARM.
>
> Dependent packages will require it with BuildRequires: webrtc-devel
> webrtc-static and include Provides: bundled(webrtc) = %{webrtc_version}.
>

It is permitted, but you don't need bundled() Provides on packages
that do this, since we're tracking through BRs instead.



-- 
真実はいつも一つ!/ Always, there's only one truth!
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux