Re: Fedora 33 System-Wide Change proposal: Make btrfs the default file system for desktop variants

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sun, Jun 28, 2020 at 7:54 PM Gerald B. Cox <gbcox@xxxxxx> wrote:
> And?  I don't know about you, when dealing with file systems a chart with OK, Mostly OK and Unstable doesn't give me the warm and fuzzies.  Especially when OK is defined as:  "should be safe to use, no known major defficiencies" .  "Should" raises a red flag with me, especially given the history of BTRFS.  Again, if we're going to be making something the DEFAULT, it should have at least 1 production release.  Where is it?  I haven't been able to find one and I've asked multiple people and the response has always ducked the issue or been crickets.

I'm wondering, how do you actually want to define a "production
release" of a kernel module?
Does being part of an upstream kernel release (not in staging modules)
not qualify?
Because that's already the case, and has been for years. The
introduction of the btrfs module even predates all six currently
maintained LTS branches.

Fabio
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux