On 30. 06. 20 11:02, Miro Hrončok wrote:
On 30. 06. 20 6:40, Tom Callaway wrote:
Okay. I duct taped lua-posix into a "working" state. Also did builds for
lua-argparse, lua-expat, lua-lpeg, and rpm (so that the macros say "5.4").
Any and all help is appreciated.
Rebuilding what I can. So far:
lua-cyrussasl luadoc lua-filesystem lua-fun lua-logging lua-mosquitto lua-psl
lua-sec lua-socket lua-wsapi rrdtool vicious
The current status is:
$ comm -23 <(repoquery --refresh --repo=koji --whatrequires 'lua(abi) = 5.3'
--source | pkgname | sort) <(repoquery --repo=koji --whatrequires 'lua(abi) =
5.4' --source | pkgname | sort)
librs232
lua-cqueues
lua-event
lua-ldap
lua-luaossl
lua-luv
prosody
I will post followups in the F33FailsToInstall bugzillas.
One thing that I found surprising is that all of the packages have a
in-spec-hardcoded Lua version macro that needs to be updated during the rebuild.
Would you accept a PR for lua that adds lua-rpm-macros subpackage with
%{lua_version} (now defined as 5.4)?
--
Miro Hrončok
--
Phone: +420777974800
IRC: mhroncok
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
