> OpenZFS is frequently lagging behind in support for newer kernels which would work against > Fedora's "rolling" approach to kernel releases. Yes, there is quite often a time delay between kernel releases and OpenZFS releases that contain compatibility patches. However, in my experience, the OpenZFS developers are aware of this and act rather quickly. I believe that if a project like Fedora were to switch to ZFS, this would not be an issue at all - ZFS compatibility patches are usually available early on during the kernel development cycle, the delay is mostly due to the lack of testing and review. > Proxmox and Ubuntu don't feature rolling kernel releases. That's why they can ship > OpenZFS (without legal problems, btw). Would you care to elaborate why a rolling release kernel is not hit by any legal problems? I fail to see how that is relevant here, but then again, I am certainly not a lawyer and my understanding of the legal implications is rudimentary at best. -Armin _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
