> > microdnf reinstall tzdata > > There's a bug about this to split out the UTC tzdata into a minimal > tzdata so terrible hacks aren't needed to slim things down. > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1722233 I'll CC myself to this bug but it doesn't look like anything will happen soon. > > By comparison dockerhub, from which I used to pull fedora images > > before moving to fedora-minimal has a nice landing page [3] and > > maybe it's also failing to document pitfalls but so far the base image > > never surprised me. > > Anything that's particularly stripped back will always be a compromise > of size vs functionality, if the stacked image did what you already > needed why change? I needed to deploy more services on a very constrained box, and this has given me enough headroom not to worry for a while. Compromise is fine, but finding out through trial&error is needlessly tedious. Unless of course I missed the red tape with "here be dragons", in which case it would have been totally on me and that's where I think Fedora's container registry could be improved. I'm wondering whether container pages went blank because something went missing during the recent data center move. Dridi _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
