* Josef Bacik: > That being said I can make btrfs look really stupid on some workloads. > There's going to be cases where Btrfs isn't awesome. We still use xfs > for all our storage related tiers (think databases). Performance is > always going to be workload dependent, and Btrfs has built in overhead > out the gate because of checksumming and the fact that we generate far > more metadata. Just to be clear here, the choice of XFS here is purely based on performance, not on the reliability of the file systems, right? (So it's not “all the really important data is stored in XFS”.) Thanks, Florian _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
